ABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of combined non-invasive support strategies in critically ill COVID-19 patients [high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or both]. Method(s): Prospective observational multicenter study in 73 Spanish ICU with data obtained from the SEMICYUC registry. All confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted due to respiratory failure were included. They were classified according to the ventilatory strategy used on admission and subsequently according to success, failure, or strategy change. Demographic data, comorbidities, severity at admission, respiratory, biomarkers, failure, length of stay and mortality were evaluated. Result(s): We analyzed 3,889 patients, 33% receiving HFNC, and 11% NIV at ICU admission. NIV group compared to HFNC were more severely ill with more shock on admission. When NIV was received as a first-choice higher failure rates and mortality were shown vs HFNC (68% vs 61%, p=0.016 and 27% vs 20%, p=0.003). Among patients who initially received HFNC, 57% failed and 7.4% switched to NIV, with no change in mortality. Among patients who were switched to NIV, 66% failed presenting a higher mortality trend than the intubated patients after the HFNC starting (40% vs 30%, p=0.098). Among patients who initially received NIV, 60% failed and 20% switched to HFNC. Patients in whom NIV was switched to HFNC, had lower mortality than patients who initially failed (18% vs 40%, p<0.001). Among patients who were switched to HFNC, 43% failed, presenting the same mortality as the intubated patients after the NIV starting (38% vs 38%, p=0.934). Conclusion(s): Patients receiving NIV at admission have worse outcomes than those receiving HFNC. Changing the strategy in patients who received HFNC as a first choice without success can worsen the prognosis.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine if the use of corticosteroids was associated with Intensive Care Unit (ICU) mortality among whole population and pre-specified clinical phenotypes. DESIGN: A secondary analysis derived from multicenter, observational study. SETTING: Critical Care Units. PATIENTS: Adult critically ill patients with confirmed COVID-19 disease admitted to 63 ICUs in Spain. INTERVENTIONS: Corticosteroids vs. no corticosteroids. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Three phenotypes were derived by non-supervised clustering analysis from whole population and classified as (A: severe, B: critical and C: life-threatening). We performed a multivariate analysis after propensity optimal full matching (PS) for whole population and weighted Cox regression (HR) and Fine-Gray analysis (sHR) to assess the impact of corticosteroids on ICU mortality according to the whole population and distinctive patient clinical phenotypes. RESULTS: A total of 2017 patients were analyzed, 1171 (58%) with corticosteroids. After PS, corticosteroids were shown not to be associated with ICU mortality (OR: 1.0; 95% CI: 0.98-1.15). Corticosteroids were administered in 298/537 (55.5%) patients of "A" phenotype and their use was not associated with ICU mortality (HR=0.85 [0.55-1.33]). A total of 338/623 (54.2%) patients in "B" phenotype received corticosteroids. No effect of corticosteroids on ICU mortality was observed when HR was performed (0.72 [0.49-1.05]). Finally, 535/857 (62.4%) patients in "C" phenotype received corticosteroids. In this phenotype HR (0.75 [0.58-0.98]) and sHR (0.79 [0.63-0.98]) suggest a protective effect of corticosteroids on ICU mortality. CONCLUSION: Our finding warns against the widespread use of corticosteroids in all critically ill patients with COVID-19 at moderate dose. Only patients with the highest inflammatory levels could benefit from steroid treatment.
ABSTRACT
Objective To determine if the use of corticosteroids was associated with Intensive Care Unit (ICU) mortality among whole population and pre-specified clinical phenotypes. Design A secondary analysis derived from multicenter, observational study. Setting Critical Care Units. Patients Adult critically ill patients with confirmed COVID-19 disease admitted to 63 ICUs in Spain. Interventions Corticosteroids vs. no corticosteroids. Main variables of interest Three phenotypes were derived by non-supervised clustering analysis from whole population and classified as (A: severe, B: critical and C: life-threatening). We performed a multivariate analysis after propensity optimal full matching (PS) for whole population and weighted Cox regression (HR) and Fine-Gray analysis (sHR) to assess the impact of corticosteroids on ICU mortality according to the whole population and distinctive patient clinical phenotypes. Results A total of 2017 patients were analyzed, 1171 (58%) with corticosteroids. After PS, corticosteroids were shown not to be associated with ICU mortality (OR: 1.0;95% CI: 0.98–1.15). Corticosteroids were administered in 298/537 (55.5%) patients of “A” phenotype and their use was not associated with ICU mortality (HR = 0.85 [0.55–1.33]). A total of 338/623 (54.2%) patients in “B” phenotype received corticosteroids. No effect of corticosteroids on ICU mortality was observed when HR was performed (0.72 [0.49–1.05]). Finally, 535/857 (62.4%) patients in “C” phenotype received corticosteroids. In this phenotype HR (0.75 [0.58–0.98]) and sHR (0.79 [0.63–0.98]) suggest a protective effect of corticosteroids on ICU mortality. Conclusion Our finding warns against the widespread use of corticosteroids in all critically ill patients with COVID-19 at moderate dose. Only patients with the highest inflammatory levels could benefit from steroid treatment.
ABSTRACT
HEMOCOVID-19 is a multi-center trial aiming to assess the microvascular and endothelial health of severe COVID-19 patients in the intensive care using near-infrared spectroscopy. Here, we present the preliminary results, showing that peripheral microcirculatory alterations are associated with the severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome. © 2022 The Author(s).
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Critical Care , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
We present the HEMOCOVID-19 study spanning four countries and eight hospitals where near-infrared spectroscopy is utilized to evaluate microvascular and endothelial health of severe COVID-19 patients at the intensive care. © 2021 SPIE. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) infected with SARS-CoV-2 may be at risk to develop a severe course of COVID-19 due to the immune dysregulation or the influence of immunomodulating drugs on the course of the infection. For a better understanding of SARS-CoV-2 infections in patients with IRD and due to the high incidence of COVID-19 in Madrid from the beginning of this pandemic infection in Spain, the Society of Rheumatology from Madrid (SORCOM) established a registry (REUMA-COVID SORCOM) shortly after the beginning of the pandemic in Spain. Objectives: To determine factors associated with severity of infection with SARS-CoV-2 in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Madrid Methods: The REUMA-COVID SORCOM registry is a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study conducted in Madrid, a SORCOM initiative. All rheumatology departments from Madrid were invited to participate. The study includes patients with IRD presenting with a confirmed or highly suspected diagnosis of COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and November 10, 2020. We consider severe infection death or need of hospitalization. Inclusion criteria was having an IRD and at least 1 of the following 4 criteria: (1) a biologically confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis based on a positive result of a SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test on a nasopharyngeal swab;(2) Detection of IgM or IgG anti SARSCoV2 in a symptomatic or asymptomatic patients (3)typical thoracic computed tomography (CT) abnormalities (ground-glass opacities) in epidemic areas;(4) COVID19-typical symptoms in an epidemic zone of COVID-19. Results: As of November 10, 2020, 417 patients with IRD were included in the REUMA-COVID SORCOM registry. 5 patients were discharged for incomplete data. Of 412 patients (mean age 57 years, 87.4% Caucasian race, 66.3% female) 174 need hospitalization (42.2%) and 33 patients died (18.4% mortality in hospitalized patients). 82.3% had comorbidities. 234 (56.8%) patients were classified as inflammatory arthropathy, 133 (32.3%) had connective tissue diseases (CTD). 41.1% of the patients had a large history of IRD (≥ 10 years). 10.4% of patients had previously pulmonary involvement. The study includes 143 patients taking Methotrexate, 89 patients taking anti-TNFα therapy and 27 Rituximab. In the univariant analysis, no differences were seen in the severity of COVID-19 infection in patients taking methotrexate. 63% of the all patients taking Rituximab included in the registry need hospitalization and 22% of them died. Hypertension, COPD or cardiovascular disease was associated with hospitalization. Independent factors associated with COVID-19 hospitalization in the multivariate analysis was: age (≥62 years), male sex, IMC ≥30, previous cardiovascular comorbidities and the IRD disease duration (≥ 10 years). Independent factors associated with COVID-19 related death was: age (≥ 62 years), having a CTD diagnose, pulmonary involvement before infection and chronical GC treatment. Conclusion: Patients with IRD represent a population of particular interest in the pandemic context because the baseline immunological alteration and the treated with immunosuppressants agents they receive, comorbidities and the well-known risk of severe infection. Older age, male sex, cardiovascular comorbidities were factors associated with high risk of hospitalization in IRD patients. CTD diseases, previously pulmonary involvement and chronical GC treatment with more than 10mg/day were associated with high risk of death. Neither anti TNF-α treatment nor Methotrexate were risk factor for hospitalization or death COVID-19 related in IRD patients.
ABSTRACT
Background: Diagnosis of previous SARS-COV2 infection may be challenging in immunocompromised patients. Objectives: To analyze positivity rate to SARS-COV2 antibody tests (SC2AT) in patients diagnosed of rheumatic diseases (RMD) treated with Rituximab. Methods: We conducted a case-control study of patients diagnosed of RMD followed in a referral hospital in Madrid, Spain. Positivity rate to IgG-SC2AT were analyzed in Rituximab-treated patients (RTX) compared with patients treated with TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and/or conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) (N-RTX). We included patients that received Rituximab in the previous year to a confirmed SARS-COV2 infection (defined as a positive polymerase chain reaction test (PCR) and/or compatible chest Xray), to a suspected SARS-COV2 infection (2 or more symptoms) or to SC2AT determination. Patients with RMD treated with other biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) rather than Rituximab or TNFi were excluded. Results: We included 152 patients with RMD who underwent a SC2AT. Main characteristics are reported in Table 1. Among RTX and N-RTX, 4/48 (8.3%) and 35/104 (33.7%) showed a positive IgG-SC2AT, respectively. Four out of 104 (38.5%) N-RTX tested positive without previous symptoms. No asymptomatic infection was diagnosed among RTX. Univariable analysis showed a lower rate of positivity to SC2AT in confirmed and suspected infection among RTX [Positive IgG-SC2AT in confirmed infection: RTX 4/10 (40%), N-RTX 16/20 (80%);p=0.045. Positive IgG-SC2AT in suspected infection: RTX 0/3 (0%), N-RTX 15/18 (83.3%);p=0.015]. A logistic binary regression identified previous symptoms [OR 61.2, 95CI(13.3-280.6) p=0.0001], male sex [OR 4.8, 95CI(1.3-17.8) p=0.02], non-rituximab treatment [OR 19.7, 95CI(3.6-106.3) p=0.001] as independent factors associated with a higher probability of positive IgG-SC2AT. Age, previous PCR status, corticosteroid and cDMARD use showed no statistical significance. This model accounted for 47.6% of positive cases. Conclusion: RTX had a lower rate of positivity to IgG-SC2AT compared to N-RTX. Previous symptoms, male sex and non-RTX treatment were independently associated with higher probability of positive IgG-SC2AT.
ABSTRACT
Background and aims: SARS CoV2 encephalopathy is now a recognized entity. We present five cases of encephalopathy associated with SARS CoV2 with focal presentation. Methods: Case series Results: Five patients were included (4 males and one woman), mean age was 60 (58-76). Four patients required mechanical ventilation. The clinical presentation were aphasia (3/5), hemianopia (1/5), hemiparesis (1/5) and akinetic mutism (1/5) Metabolic disturbances and vascular etiology were ruled out. Neuroimaging with cranial CT with CT angiography or MRi was performed in all cases. In 3/5 CNS lumbar puncture was performed, showing mirror pattern oligoclonal bands in all of them. The clinic progressively improved until it disappeared in all of them. Conclusion: SARS CoV2 encephalopathy may present with focal symptoms. More studies are needed to elucidate its pathogenesis. As possible explanations, we propose inflammatory activation at the CNS level, sustained hypoxia. Direct CNS invasion seems less probable.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Specific respiratory tract infections, including COVID-19, may cause smell and/or taste disorders (STDs) with increased frequency. The aim was to determine whether new-onset STDs are more frequent amongst COVID-19 patients than influenza patients. METHOD: This was a case-control study including hospitalized patients of two tertiary care centres. Consecutive patients positive for COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (cases) and patients positive for influenza polymerase chain reaction (historical control sample) were assessed during specific periods, employing a self-reported STD questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy-nine cases and 40 controls were included. No significant differences were found in basal features between the two groups. New-onset STDs were significantly more frequent amongst cases (31, 39.2%) than in the control group (5, 12.5 %) [adjusted odds ratio 21.4 (2.77-165.4, P = 0.003)]. COVID-19 patients with new-onset STDs were significantly younger than COVID-19 patients without STDs (52.6 ± 17.2 vs. 67.4 ± 15.1, P < 0.001). Amongst COVID-19 patients who presented STDs, 22 (70.9%) recalled an acute onset and it was an initial manifestation in 11 (35.5%). Twenty-five (80.6%) presented smell disorders (mostly anosmia, 14, 45.2%) and 28 (90.3%) taste disorders (mostly ageusia, 14, 45.2%). Only four (12.9 %) reported concomitant nasal obstruction. The mean duration of STD was 7.5 ± 3.2 days and 12 patients (40%) manifested complete recovery after 7.4 ± 2.3 days of onset. CONCLUSION: New-onset STDs were significantly more frequent amongst COVID-19 patients than influenza patients; they usually had an acute onset and were commonly an initial manifestation. The use of STD assessment in anamnesis as a hint for COVID-19 and to support individuals' self-isolation in the current epidemic context is suggested.